Comments on: Q2: do you need a website http://www.minorissues.be/2007/04/03/q2-do-you-need-a-website/ new marketing blog Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:31:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5 By: Philippe http://www.minorissues.be/2007/04/03/q2-do-you-need-a-website/comment-page-1/#comment-233 Philippe Thu, 05 Apr 2007 15:29:47 +0000 #comment-233 Absolutly and the failures of web 2.0 are really explainable. It didn’t went out of hand because of what the web is about, it went out of hand because they were terrible and dishonnest campaigns.

]]> By: Steven http://www.minorissues.be/2007/04/03/q2-do-you-need-a-website/comment-page-1/#comment-232 Steven Thu, 05 Apr 2007 09:20:26 +0000 #comment-232 Happy to participate!
Q3 is though, because we’re supposed to support new marketing. Pointing out failures feels like attacking the ideas.
But just remember that in classical marketing things go wrong as well.

]]> By: Philippe http://www.minorissues.be/2007/04/03/q2-do-you-need-a-website/comment-page-1/#comment-231 Philippe Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:12:36 +0000 #comment-231 Thanks again.

I’m working of question number 3 (the cases where it went wrong) and I must admit I struggle with this one.

]]> By: wza http://www.minorissues.be/2007/04/03/q2-do-you-need-a-website/comment-page-1/#comment-230 wza Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:53:23 +0000 #comment-230 more and more a marketeer every day :)

but still, some thoughtprovoking stuff, keep em comin’.

]]>